• Home
  • About
    • What We Do
    • THR In the News
    • Our Founder & Publisher
    • Our History
    • Founding Sponsors
    • Community Partners
    • Advisors
  • Top of Day
  • News
    • Arizona News
    • National News
  • Member Resources
    • Comings & Goings
    • 2022 State of the State Post-Conference Resources
    • Industry Links
    • White Papers, E books, Reports and more
    • Toolbox
  • Professional Directory
    • THR Business Directory
    • Member Directory
    • Founding Sponsors
    • Community Partners
    • Advisors
    • Corporate Profile Intake Form
    • Corporate Profile Change Request
  • Newsletter/Data
    • The Hertel Report October 2025 Newsletter
    • Data Resources
    • Newsletter Archive
  • Events/Products
  • Register
  • Log in
The Hertel Report
  • Contact Us
  • Events
  • Become a Member
  • My Membership
  • My Profile
The Hertel Report
  • Home
  • About
    • What We Do
    • THR In the News
    • Our Founder & Publisher
    • Our History
    • Founding Sponsors
    • Community Partners
    • Advisors
  • Top of Day
  • News
    • Arizona News
    • National News
  • Member Resources
    • Comings & Goings
    • 2022 State of the State Post-Conference Resources
    • Industry Links
    • White Papers, E books, Reports and more
    • Toolbox
  • Professional Directory
    • THR Business Directory
    • Member Directory
    • Founding Sponsors
    • Community Partners
    • Advisors
    • Corporate Profile Intake Form
    • Corporate Profile Change Request
  • Newsletter/Data
    • The Hertel Report October 2025 Newsletter
    • Data Resources
    • Newsletter Archive
  • Events/Products
Home
CMS Rules

CMMI Considers New Value-Based Payment Model for Oncology Care

March 11th, 2020 Veronica Graff Arizona News, Arizona News, CMS Rules, National News, News

Last year, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation (CMMI) released a Request for Information as it sought comments for its Oncology Care First (OCF)  proposal, a voluntary model open to physician groups and hospital outpatient departments offering two payment mechanisms. Now it is considering the addition of clinical laboratory services to bundled payments in its proposal.

“The inefficiency and variation in oncology care in the United States is well documented, with avoidable hospitalizations and emergency department visits occurring frequently, high service utilization at the end of life, and use of high-cost drugs and biologicals when lower-cost, clinically equivalent options exist,” the CMMI RFI states

In addition, the RFI states the consideration of services such as imaging or medical laboratory services in the OFC’s monthly population payment. In a letter to CMMI Acting Director Amy Bassano, Cynthia Bens, Personalized Medical Coalition senior VP for public policy, expressed her concerns:

Laboratory services are crucial to the diagnosis and management of many cancers and are an essential component of personalized medicine. We are concerned that adding laboratory service fees to the MPP may cause providers to view them as expenses that are part of the total cost of delivering care, rather than an integral part of the solution to attain high-value care.”

Weighing in on the value-based model, Bens called on CMMI to connect with laboratory and provider communities to construct the best way to contain costs within the model.

The agency also proposed a controversial Radiation Oncology alternative payment model to be implemented in less than for months for practices in randomly-selected metro areas. CMMI estimates that it would apply to about 40% of the radiotherapy practices in the U.S. The five-year model would make prospective payments to cover radiotherapy services for patients diagnosed with cancer.

For more on the proposal, check out Dark Daily.

Also, take a look at the RFI here.

And for more on the OFC model, check out The Flatiron Blog.

  • Tags
  • Bundled Payments
  • Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation
  • clinical laboratory services
  • medical laboratories
  • Oncology Care Model
  • surgical pathologists
  • Value-based payments
Facebook Twitter Google+ LinkedIn Pinterest
Next article CMS Announces Voluntary Models for Enhanced Part D Plans - $35 Copay for Insulin
Previous article Arizona Supreme Court Finds Federal Law Overrules State 'Balance Billing' Law

Veronica Graff

Business journalist and recent graduate from the Walter Cronkite School of Journalism and Mass Communication with minors in business and philosophy. Emphasis in financial, economic and market reporting. Regular contributor to The Hertel Report.

Related Posts

The Hertel Report Winter State of the State Conference News

The Hertel Report Winter State of the State Conference

News

DEA Extends Telemedicine Flexibilities to Ensure Continued Access to Care

Just ahead of the scheduled expiration of telemedicine prescribing flexibilities, Federal regulators...
CMS Rules

CMS Proposes Update to Transparency Rules for Health Service Pricing

Last Friday, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) issued a new proposed rule that would...

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Home
  • About
  • Top of Day
  • News
  • Member Resources
  • Professional Directory
  • Newsletter/Data
  • Events/Products
  • Back to top
© The Hertel Report 2017. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy